Why the study?
Does the use of Computerised Decision Support Systems (CDSS) improve treatment quality in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy compared to manual methods?
Does the use of Computerised Decision Support Systems (CDSS) improve treatment quality in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy compared to manual methods?
Computerised Decision Support Systems can facilitate the decentralization of oral anticoagulation management to primary care without compromising the quality of control.
May support CDSS-enabled primary care anticoagulation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
The constantly workload increase has led to the development of Computerised Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for a better management of patient care. Many clinical situations have been investigated to verify the utility of CDSS: few have demonstrated stable effects. One area where success has been reported is the field of oral anticoagulation management. CDSS system has demonstrated to be able to improve the treatment quality in comparison to manual method. In the future scenario of oral anticoagulant management CDSS will have a pivotal part, the constant increase of patients number and their pressure on thrombosis centres had led to the development of alternative models for delivery OAT: Primary care, General Practitioner, Patient self testing and self management and the use of CDSS has been central to the decentralisation process and may be useful in maintaining the efficacy and quality of anticoagulant control. GP with the aid of CDSS are able to deliver OAT as well as expert physician of Thrombosis Centre in terms of time spent by patient in therapeutic range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manotti et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: