Key result
Surface diaphragm electromyography provided good agreement with airflow signals for estimating neural inspiratory onset and offset, requiring no filtering of cardiac muscle interference.
A novel method using surface diaphragm electromyography accurately estimates neural inspiratory time onset and offset without requiring filtering of cardiac muscle interference.
Should not yet change respiratory monitoring practice; hypothesis-generating pilot data warrant larger prospective validation.
This study evaluates the onset and offset of neural inspiratory time estimated from surface diaphragm electromyographic (EMGdi) recordings. EMGdi and airflow signals were recorded in ten healthy subjects according to two respiratory protocols based on respiratory rate (RR) increments, from 15 to 40 breaths per minute (bpm), and fractional inspiratory time (Ti/Ttot) decrements, from 0.54 to 0.18. The analysis of EMGdi signal amplitude is an alternative approach for the quantification of neural respiratory drive. The EMGdi amplitude was estimated using the fixed sample entropy computed over a 250 ms moving window of the EMGdi signal (EMGdifse). The neural onset was detected through a dynamic threshold over the EMGdifse using the kernel density estimation method, while neural offset was detected by finding when the EMGdifse had decreased to 70% of the peak value reached during inspiration. The Bland-Altman analysis between airflow and neural onsets showed a global bias of 46 ms in the RR protocol and 22 ms in the Ti /Ttot protocol. The Bland-Altman analysis between airflow and neural offsets reveals a global bias of 11 ms in the RR protocol and -2 ms in the Ti/T tot protocol. The relationship between pairs of RR values (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.99, Bland-=Altman limits of -2.39 to 2.41 bpm, and mean bias of 0.01 bpm) and between pairs of Ti/Ttot values (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.86, Bland-Altman limits of -0.11 to 0.10, and mean bias of -0.01) showed a good agreement. In conclusion, we propose a method for determining neural onset and neural offset based on noninvasive recordings of the electrical activity of the diaphragm that requires no filtering of cardiac muscle interference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estrada et al. (2017) studied Healthy (n=10). Surface diaphragm electromyography (EMGdi) vs. Airflow signals was evaluated on Agreement between airflow and neural onsets/offsets. Surface diaphragm electromyography provided good agreement with airflow signals for estimating neural inspiratory onset and offset, requiring no filtering of cardiac muscle interference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: