Key result
The fixed sample entropy (fSampEn) algorithm showed higher correlation with inspiratory mouth pressure (0.83±0.02) compared to traditional ARV (0.76±0.07) and RMS (0.61±0.19) methods at maximum load.
Why the study?
Does the fixed sample entropy algorithm improve the estimation of neural respiratory drive from diaphragm electromyographic signals compared to traditional ARV and RMS methods?
Does the fixed sample entropy algorithm improve the estimation of neural respiratory drive from diaphragm electromyographic signals compared to traditional ARV and RMS methods?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.83% vs 0.76%
The fixed sample entropy algorithm is less sensitive to cardiac activity artifacts and improves the estimation of neural respiratory drive from diaphragm EMG signals compared to traditional methods.
fSampEn may enhance diaphragm EMG analysis; hypothesis-generating for neural drive estimation and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Diaphragm electromyography is a valuable technique for the recording of electrical activity of the diaphragm. The analysis of diaphragm electromyographic (EMGdi) signal amplitude is an alternative approach for the quantification of the neural respiratory drive (NRD). The EMGdi signal is, however, corrupted by electrocardiographic (ECG) activity, and this presence of cardiac activity can make the EMGdi interpretation more difficult. Traditionally, the EMGdi amplitude has been estimated using the average rectified value (ARV) and the root mean square (RMS). In this study, surface EMGdi signals were analyzed using the fixed sample entropy (fSampEn) algorithm, and compared to the traditional ARV and RMS methods. The fSampEn is calculated using a tolerance value fixed and independent of the standard deviation of the analysis window. Thus, this method quantifies the amplitude of the complex components of stochastic signals (such as EMGdi), and being less affected by changes in amplitude due to less complex components (such as ECG). The proposed method was tested in synthetic and recorded EMGdi signals. fSampEn was less sensitive to the effect of cardiac activity on EMGdi signals with different levels of NRD than ARV and RMS amplitude parameters. The mean and standard deviation of the Pearson's correlation values between inspiratory mouth pressure (an indirect measure of the respiratory muscle activity) and fSampEn, ARV, and RMS parameters, estimated in the recorded EMGdi signal at tidal volume (without inspiratory load), were 0.38±0.12, 0.27±0.11 , and 0.11±0.13, respectively. Whereas at 33 cmH2O (maximum inspiratory load) were 0.83±0.02, 0.76±0.07, and 0.61±0.19 , respectively. Our findings suggest that the proposed method may improve the evaluation of NRD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estrada et al. (2015) studied this question. Fixed sample entropy (fSampEn) algorithm vs. Average rectified value (ARV) and root mean square (RMS) was evaluated on Pearson's correlation between inspiratory mouth pressure and amplitude parameters at 33 cmH2O (maximum inspiratory load). The fixed sample entropy (fSampEn) algorithm showed higher correlation with inspiratory mouth pressure (0.83±0.02) compared to traditional ARV (0.76±0.07) and RMS (0.61±0.19) methods at maximum load.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: