Key result
fSampEn improves diaphragm mechanomyographic amplitude estimation over ARV and RMS by resisting cardiac noise.
Why the study?
Standard amplitude estimations of diaphragm mechanomyographic signals are greatly affected by cardiac vibration or mechanocardiographic noise.
Using sample entropy with fixed tolerance values improves the estimation of respiratory muscle effort from diaphragm mechanomyographic signals by reducing cardiac vibration interference.
May aid respiratory monitoring by mitigating cardiac artifact; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The analysis of amplitude parameters of the diaphragm mechanomyographic (MMGdi) signal is a non-invasive technique to assess respiratory muscle effort and to detect and quantify the severity of respiratory muscle weakness. The amplitude of the MMGdi signal is usually evaluated using the average rectified value or the root mean square of the signal. However, these estimations are greatly affected by the presence of cardiac vibration or mechanocardiographic (MCG) noise. In this study, we present a method for improving the estimation of the respiratory muscle effort from MMGdi signals that is robust to the presence of MCG. This method is based on the calculation of the sample entropy using fixed tolerance values (fSampEn), that is, with tolerance values that are not normalized by the local standard deviation of the window analyzed. The behavior of the fSampEn parameter was tested in synthesized mechanomyographic signals, with different ratios between the amplitude of the MCG and clean mechanomyographic components. As an example of application of this technique, the use of fSampEn was explored also in recorded MMGdi signals, with different inspiratory loads. The results with both synthetic and recorded signals indicate that the entropy parameter is less affected by the MCG noise, especially at low signal-to-noise ratios. Therefore, we believe that the proposed fSampEn parameter could improve estimates of respiratory muscle effort from MMGdi signals with the presence of MCG interference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarlabous et al. (2014) studied this question. Sample entropy with fixed tolerance values (fSampEn) vs. Average rectified value (ARV) and root mean square (RMS) was evaluated on Estimation of respiratory muscle effort (correlation with inspiratory mouth pressure and mean relative error). The fSampEn parameter provided a better amplitude estimation of diaphragm mechanomyographic signals and was less affected by cardiac noise compared to ARV and RMS, especially at low signal-to-noise ratios.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: