Key result
In patients with left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy, reduced LVEF, left atrial enlargement, and higher CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc scores are significant predictors of systemic embolism and stroke.
Why the study?
Patients with LVNC have an increased risk of embolic events, but more data are needed to identify high-risk patients who benefit from anticoagulation treatment.
What are the risk factors for embolic events in patients with left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy, and when is anticoagulation indicated?
What are the risk factors for embolic events in patients with left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy, and when is anticoagulation indicated?
Clinical risk scores, LVEF, and left atrial diameter can help identify patients with LVNC who are at high risk for embolic events and may benefit from targeted anticoagulation therapy.
Hypothesis-generating for embolism risk stratification in LVNC; leaves open anticoagulation thresholds pending prospective validation.
Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is characterized by prominent ventricular trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. Patients with LVNC have an increased risk of embolic events. The presence of symptoms at the time of diagnosis can be a risk marker for stroke/embolic events. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as measured by transthoracic echocardiography and left atrial diameter, has been found to be a significant predictor of systemic embolism in LVNC patients. Furthermore, CHADS 2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus and stroke or transient ischemic attack) and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, age 65–74 years and sex category [female]) scores were significantly higher in patients with stroke or embolism. Although the difference was not statistically significant, pediatric patients with LVNC combined with other congenital heart defects had more thromboembolic events compared to patients with isolated LVNC. On the other hand, stroke/transient ischemic attacks did not differ significantly between patients with isolated apical LVNC and mid-basal noncompaction. Furthermore, no differences in the prevalence of stroke between the quantiles of the maximal ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium have been revealed. Additionally, current data show no association between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and stroke/embolic events. Current evidence suggests anticoagulation treatment in LVNC patients with prior embolic events, atrial fibrillation, presence of left ventricular (LV) thrombus, and/or LV dysfunction. In patients with LVNC without a clear indication for anticoagulation, anticoagulant therapy may be considered in patients with CHADS 2 score ≥2. More data are needed to identify patients at higher risk of embolic events who will be benefited from anticoagulation treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazoukis et al. (2023) conducted a review in Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC). Risk factors (LVEF, left atrial diameter, CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc scores) was evaluated on Stroke or systemic embolism. In patients with left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy, reduced LVEF, left atrial enlargement, and higher CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc scores are significant predictors of systemic embolism and stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: