Key result
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for primary resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas require a histology-specific approach, with radiotherapy showing potential benefit for liposarcoma.
Why the study?
Recent trial findings have prompted further questions regarding histology-driven treatment paradigms and the role of neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for primary resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas.
Does neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy improve outcomes in patients with primary resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas?
Does neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy improve outcomes in patients with primary resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas?
This review highlights the shift towards histology-specific neoadjuvant treatment paradigms for retroperitoneal sarcomas following the STRASS trial.
Supports histology-specific neoadjuvant strategies; leaves open radiotherapy benefit in liposarcoma pending higher-level evidence.
The cornerstone of therapy for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) is complete surgical resection, best achieved by resecting the tumor en bloc with adherent structures even if not overtly infiltrated. Until recently, trials designed to elucidate the role of neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for RPS have been unable to achieve sufficient enrollment. The completion of the STRASS trial, which explored neoadjuvant radiotherapy for primary resectable RPS, is a major milestone in RPS research, but has prompted further questions about histology-driven treatment paradigms for RPS. Though it was ultimately a negative trial with respect to its primary endpoint of abdominal recurrence-free survival, STRASS produced a signal that suggested improved abdominal recurrence-free survival with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for patients with liposarcoma (LPS). No effect was seen for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or high-grade dedifferentiated (DD) LPS, consistent with recent literature suggesting LMS and high-grade DD-LPS have a predominant pattern of distant rather than local failure. These results, along with those from other recent studies conducted at the bench and the bedside, emphasize the importance of a histology-specific approach to RPS research. Recent evidence for patterns of distant failure in LMS and high-grade DD-LPS has prompted the initiation of STRASS2, a study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for these histologies. As this study unfolds, evidence may emerge for novel systemic therapy options in specific sarcoma histotypes given the explosion in targeted and immunotherapeutic applications over the last decade. This article reviews current and recent evidence around neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy as well as avenues for future study to optimize these treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Istl et al. (2022) conducted a review in Primary resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). Neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy was evaluated. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for primary resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas require a histology-specific approach, with radiotherapy showing potential benefit for liposarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: