Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper discusses a collaborative research project between a Swiss museum and a descendant community tied to an ethnographic collection from Namibia. As chief engineer of the Otavi Mining and Railway Company from 1903-1905, the Swiss collector Victor Solioz was more than a key player in the development of colonial infrastructure: railway construction was also directly linked to colonial violence in Namibia. What began as archival research into the collection’s provenance and appropriation history became - with the involvement of the descendants of railway workers in the Namibian town of Usakos - a project to historicise 330 artefacts that were once catalogued as ethnographic objects in the Bern History Museum. The case study helps illustrate that although Switzerland was not a colonial power, its colonial complicity is particularly evident in the history of its museum collections. Furthermore, it shows that community-building and collective reappropriation strategies can be highly productive from a methodological point of view, as they counter a paralysing absence of African biographies in museum archives with the powerful presence of a diverse community and its realisation of shared descendancy and collective memory. Throughout the project, narratives shifted, with the focus on violent appropriation broadening to include a joint investigation into the social history of the railway workers. The ethnographic collection once named after Mr. Solioz became the ‘Usakos Railway Workers’ Collection’. The project yielded a wealth of knowledge about the artefacts and a new understanding of belonging. Thus, restitution of the collection is not only the wish of the descendants, but the result of collaborative research practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel B. Bachmann (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: