Key result
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided stenting in an infarct-related artery with minimal viability by nuclear study resulted in significant myocardial recovery at 1 month.
Why the study?
Does FFR-guided revascularization improve myocardial recovery in patients with recent large MI and minimal viability on nuclear study?
Case Report (n=1)
Does FFR-guided revascularization improve myocardial recovery in patients with recent large MI and minimal viability on nuclear study?
FFR may be useful to identify ischemic but viable myocardium that can recover after revascularization, even when nuclear imaging suggests minimal viability post-MI.
Evaluation of ischemia and the extent of viable myocardium is required prior to consideration of revascularizing a lesion after a myocardial infarction in which there is hypo- or akinesis. We present a case in which we utilized fractional flow reserve (FFR) of a lesion in a patient whose nuclear study 7 days after infarction suggested minimal viability in the infarct zone. After FFR was positive, stenting was performed with recovery of a large amount of viable myocardium at 1 month as shown on nuclear study. This case illustrates that if ischemia is demonstrated by FFR in an infarct-related artery even with minimal viability by nuclear study, revascularization may result in significant myocardial recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleti et al. (2011) conducted a case report in recent large myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction (n=1). Fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided stenting was evaluated on myocardial recovery. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided stenting in an infarct-related artery with minimal viability by nuclear study resulted in significant myocardial recovery at 1 month.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: