Key result
Nonadherence to NOACs within the first 6 months of use was significantly associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR 1.82, p=0.002) and DVT/PE (HR 2.12, p=0.010).
Why the study?
Does adherence to NOACs reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and DVT/PE in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=3,629)
Yes
Does adherence to NOACs reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and DVT/PE in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 1.82
p-value: p=0.002
High adherence (PDC ≥80%) to NOACs in atrial fibrillation patients significantly reduces the risk of ischemic stroke and DVT/PE without increasing the risk of major bleeding.
Early NOAC nonadherence may warrant closer monitoring; leaves open whether adherence interventions reduce stroke or VTE events.
OBJECTIVES: Our study examined the impact of adherence to novel oral anticoagulants [NOACs - dabigatran and rivaroxaban] on ischemic-stroke (IS), major-bleeding (MB), deep-vein-thrombosis and pulmonary-embolism (DVTPE) risk in a large, nationwide, propensity-matched sample. METHODS: -VASc score ≥1 were included. Patients were categorized as adherent versus nonadherent (using proportion of days covered [PDC ≥80%]) based on their NOAC use up to 6 months and those continued its use up to 12 months. The patients were matched using propensity score (based on inverse probability treatment weighting) and the risk of IS, MB, DVTPE outcomes was evaluated for the matched cohorts' post-adherence (exposure) assessment using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 3,629 and 1,946 patients with at least 6 and 12 months of NOAC use were included. Based on a PDC threshold of ≥80%, adherence rates at 6 and 12 month usage were 77% and 76%, respectively. Patients with lowest adherence were from the South, had low stroke risk and EPO/HMO insurance. Using Cox models with matched cohorts, nonadherence within the first 6 months' use was significantly associated with higher risk of IS and DVTPE (IS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82, p = .002; DVTPE: HR = 2.12, p = .010) and the risk increased with nonadherence for the prolonged period of 12 months' use (IS: HR = 2.08, p = .022; DVTPE: HR = 5.39, p = .003). The risk of MB was not different (p > .05) between adherent and nonadherent groups for both 6 month and 12 month cohorts. CONCLUSION: Adherence to NOACs for both 6 months and prolonged use (up to 12 months) was associated with a reduction in IS and DVTPE risk, but did not substantially increase risk of MB. Further studies on newer, individual NOACs and older populations are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deshpande et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=3,629). Nonadherence to NOACs (PDC <80%) vs. Adherence to NOACs (PDC ≥80%) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke at 6 months (HR 1.82, p=0.002). Nonadherence to NOACs within the first 6 months of use was significantly associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR 1.82, p=0.002) and DVT/PE (HR 2.12, p=0.010).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: