Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For workers at 28°C, standard V̇o2 = 0.166 M.84 where V̇o2 is ml h−1 and M is mass in g. At the same temperature, pupal V̇o2 = 0.156 M.83. Gross cost of transport (GCOT) and net cost of transport (NCOT) decreased with body mass and running speed, log GCOT = 0.87 − (1.05 log s) − (0.55 log M) and log NCOT = 0.51 − (0.92 log S) − (0.66 log M) where GCOT and NCOT are ml O2 g−1 km−1, S is cm s−1, and M is mass in g: The energetics of load carriage was measured in workers carrying pupae. The mean V̇o2 Of laden ants (mean mass .0108 g) was 5.72 ml O2 g−1 h−1. The mean respiratory exchange ratio of inactive ants in a bivouac was 0.72, that of unladen workers while running was 0.68, and that of pupae was 0.64. A model is developed and presented as a computer program (BASIC) to predict the energy spent for maintaining a raiding column, for colony emigration, and for a colony while in bivouac. The energetic performance of Eciton hamatum is compared with that of a leaf-cutting ant, Atta colombica.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartholomew et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: