Key result
The modified Alvarado score had a sensitivity of 78.7% and specificity of 25%, while ultrasound imaging had a sensitivity of 78.19% and specificity of 50% in diagnosing acute appendicitis.
Why the study?
Removing a normal appendix poses an economic burden, while misdiagnosis and delayed surgery risk perforation and peritonitis.
What is the comparative diagnostic accuracy of the modified Alvarado score versus ultrasound imaging for acute appendicitis in patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy?
Observational (n=200)
No
What is the comparative diagnostic accuracy of the modified Alvarado score versus ultrasound imaging for acute appendicitis in patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both the modified Alvarado score and ultrasound imaging are useful modalities for diagnosing acute appendicitis, with ultrasound providing higher specificity and serving as a good supportive tool in cases of equivocal clinical scores.
Background: Acute appendicitis is the acute inflammation of appendix which is the most common cause of acute surgical emergencies. Appendicitis can mimic other pathologies. Removing normal appendix is an economical burden both on patients and health resources. Misdiagnosis and delay in surgery can lead to complications like perforation and finally peritonitis.Methods: This was prospective comparative study carried out in 200 patients over the period of 2 years. Patients with clinical features of acute appendicitis and fitting in inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Detailed history was noted and clinical examination was done. Necessary investigations were done, modified Alvarado score was calculated and all were subjected to ultrasonography of abdomen and pelvis. Intra operative findings were noted about nature of appendix and histopathology findings were noted.Results: The sensitivity of ultrasound is 78.19% and specificity is 50%. The sensitivity of modified Alvarado scoring system is 78.7% and specificity is 25%. Negative appendicectomy rate in the study was 6%.Conclusions: Modified Alvarado score has slightly higher sensitivity and ultrasound imaging has higher specificity of in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and in decreasing negative appendicectomy rates. Ultrasound imaging provides good supportive diagnosis in cases of low or equivocal modified Alvarado scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samudre et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute appendicitis (n=200). Modified Alvarado score and ultrasound imaging vs. Histopathology (gold standard) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for acute appendicitis. The modified Alvarado score had a sensitivity of 78.7% and specificity of 25%, while ultrasound imaging had a sensitivity of 78.19% and specificity of 50% in diagnosing acute appendicitis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: