Why the study?
Is the General Coping Questionnaire (GCQ) a valid and reliable tool for measuring coping strategies in first-time myocardial infarction patients?
Is the General Coping Questionnaire (GCQ) a valid and reliable tool for measuring coping strategies in first-time myocardial infarction patients?
The 40-item General Coping Questionnaire is a well-structured and reliable tool for measuring coping strategies in patients recovering from myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports reduced GCQ for coping assessment in MI; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
The negative effects of emotional distress on the recovery following myocardial infarction make it important to study coping strategies in this situation. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and the validity of a 10 dimensions questionnaire labelled The General Coping Questionnaire (GCQ). The structure of the questionnaire was based on a previous interview study with 26 persons with different diseases. The 10 dimensions are called self-trust, problem-reducing actions, change of values, social trust, minimization, fatalism, resignation, protest, isolation and intrusion. The present study comprised 114 first-time myocardial infarction patients (37 women, 77 men). Five months after myocardial infarction, they answered questions about health-related quality of life, health complaints, sense of coherence and the GCQ. A multi-trait/multi-item analysis showed good item-scale convergent and discriminatory validity when the GCQ was reduced from 47 to 40 items. In conclusion, the results showed that the 40-item GCQ is a well-structured and reliable questionnaire for measuring coping strategies in myocardial infarction patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brink et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: