Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation boosts medication adherence ~14% vs. standard care in cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation programs on medication adherence was conflicting.
Do cardiac rehabilitation programs improve medication adherence compared to standard care in adult patients with cardiovascular disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=16,677)
Yes
Do cardiac rehabilitation programs improve medication adherence compared to standard care in adult patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cardiac rehabilitation programs significantly improve medication adherence by 14%, reduce mortality risk and primary care/ED visits, and improve quality of life and total cholesterol in patients with cardiovascular disease, though heterogeneity for adherence was high.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports routine cardiac rehabilitation referral to boost adherence; confirms efficacy in cardiovascular disease from Level 1 evidence.
Background: Education to improve medication adherence is one of the core components of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of CR programs on medication adherence is conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the effectiveness of CR programs versus standard care on medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Seven databases and clinical trial registries were searched for published and unpublished articles from database inception to 09 Feb 2022. Only randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening, extraction, and appraisal. The JBI methodology for effectiveness reviews and PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. A statistical meta-analysis of included studies was pooled using RevMan version 5.4.1. Results: In total 33 studies were included with 16,677 participants. CR programs increased medication adherence by 14 % (RR = 1.14; 95 % CI: 1.07 to 1.22; p = 0.0002) with low degree of evidence certainty. CR also lowered the risk of dying by 17 % (RR = 0.83; 95 % CI: 0.69 to 1.00; p = 0.05); primary care and emergency department visit by mean difference of 0.19 (SMD = -0.19; 95 % CI: -0.30 to -0.08; p = 0.0008); and improved quality of life by 0.93 (SMD = 0.93; 95 % CI: 0.38 to 1.49; p = 0.0010). But no significant difference was observed in lipid profiles, except with total cholesterol (SMD = -0.26; 95 % CI: -0.44 to -0.07; p = 0.006) and blood pressure levels. Conclusions: CR improves medication adherence with a low degree of evidence certainty and non-significant changes in lipid and blood pressure levels. This result requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebremichael et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiovascular disease (n=16,677). Cardiac rehabilitation programs vs. Standard care was evaluated on Medication adherence (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.22, p=0.0002). Cardiac rehabilitation programs increased medication adherence by 14% compared to standard care in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: