Key result
This review discusses the evidence for the clinical benefit and safety of novel anticoagulants versus warfarin and aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes.
Why the study?
Do novel anticoagulants improve clinical benefit and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes compared to warfarin and aspirin?
Do novel anticoagulants improve clinical benefit and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes compared to warfarin and aspirin?
This review discusses the evidence for novel anticoagulants compared to warfarin and aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, with a specific focus on the diabetic subgroup.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide NOAC selection in diabetic AF; leaves open dedicated trials for optimal regimens.
Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism which is further increased in the presence of diabetes. The new CHA 2 DS 2 VASc Risk stratification score is recommended to differentiate truly low-risk patients from intermediate and high stroke-risk patients for who oral anticoagulation would be beneficial. Alongside traditional vitamin K antagonists and aspirin, a number of novel anticoagulants, which do not require anticoagulation monitoring, have emerged in recent years. In this review we discuss the evidence for the clinical benefit and safety of the novel anticoagulants versus warfarin and aspirin among patients with atrial fibrillation and their potential role in the diabetic sub-group population of the clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burnhope et al. (2013) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and diabetes. Novel anticoagulants vs. Warfarin and aspirin was evaluated. This review discusses the evidence for the clinical benefit and safety of novel anticoagulants versus warfarin and aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: