Key result
Resolvin-D1 significantly reduced atrial fibrillation inducibility from 100% to 33% (P < 0.001) in rats with experimental right heart disease by preventing atrial fibrotic and electrical remodelling.
Why the study?
Classical anti-inflammatory molecules are ineffective in AF, and whether inflammation-resolving molecules like resolvin-D1 prevent atrial arrhythmogenic remodelling in right heart disease was unknown.
Does resolvin-D1 prevent atrial proarrhythmic remodelling and atrial fibrillation inducibility in an experimental rat model of right heart disease?
Does resolvin-D1 prevent atrial proarrhythmic remodelling and atrial fibrillation inducibility in an experimental rat model of right heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 100%
Absolute Risk Reduction: 67%
p-value: p=<0.001
Resolvin-D1 prevents atrial fibrillation-promoting right atrial remodeling and suppresses inflammatory and fibrotic changes in an experimental model of right heart disease.
Does not support clinical use of resolvin-D1; leaves open translation to human right heart disease-associated AF.
AIMS: Inflammation plays a role in atrial fibrillation (AF), but classical anti-inflammatory molecules are ineffective. Recent evidence suggests that failure of inflammation-resolution causes persistent inflammatory signalling and that a novel drug-family called resolvins promotes inflammation-resolution. Right heart disease (RHD) is associated with AF; experimental RHD shows signs of atrial inflammatory-pathway activation. Here, we evaluated resolvin-therapy effects on atrial arrhythmogenic remodelling in experimental RHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary hypertension and RHD were induced in rats with an intraperitoneal injection of 60 mg/kg monocrotaline (MCT). An intervention group received daily resolvin-D1 (RvD1), starting 1 day before MCT administration. Right atrial (RA) conduction and gene-expression were analysed respectively by optical mapping and qPCR/gene-microarray. RvD1 had no or minimal effects on MCT-induced pulmonary artery or right ventricular remodelling. Nevertheless, in vivo transoesophageal pacing induced atrial tachyarrhythmias in no CTRL rats vs. 100% MCT-only rats, and only 33% RvD1-treated MCT rats (P < 0.001 vs. MCT-only). Conduction velocity was significantly decreased by MCT, an effect prevented by RvD1. RHD caused RA dilation and fibrosis. RvD1 strongly attenuated RA fibrosis but had no effect on RA dilation. MCT increased RA expression of inflammation- and fibrosis-related gene-expression pathways on gene-microarray transcriptomic analysis, effects significantly attenuated by RvD1 (334 pathways enriched in MCT-rats vs. control; only 177 dysregulated by MCT with RvD1 treatment). MCT significantly increased RA content of type 1 (proinflammatory) CD68-positive M1 macrophages without affecting type 2 (anti-inflammatory) M2 macrophages. RvD1-treated MCT-rat RA showed significant reductions in proinflammatory M1 macrophages and increases in anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages vs. MCT-only. MCT caused statistically significant increases in protein-expression (western blot) of COL3A1, ASC, CASP1, CASP8, IL1β, TGFβ3, CXCL1, and CXCL2, and decreases in MMP2, vs. control. RvD1-treatment suppressed all these MCT-induced protein-expression changes. CONCLUSION: The inflammation-resolution enhancing molecule RvD1 prevents AF-promoting RA remodelling, while suppressing inflammatory changes and fibrotic/electrical remodelling, in RHD. Resolvins show potential promise in combating atrial arrhythmogenic remodelling by suppressing ongoing inflammatory signalling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiram et al. (2020) studied Experimental right heart disease and atrial fibrillation (n=48). Resolvin-D1 (RvD1) vs. Vehicle (MCT-only) was evaluated on Atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF) inducibility in vivo (p=<0.001). Resolvin-D1 significantly reduced atrial fibrillation inducibility from 100% to 33% (P < 0.001) in rats with experimental right heart disease by preventing atrial fibrotic and electrical remodelling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: