This review highlights the evolving role of advanced imaging techniques like CT and MRI, alongside conventional methods, for evaluating complications in patients with hip prostheses.
This article reviews contemporary evaluation of hip prostheses, emphasizing both the accepted use of conventional radiographs, arthrograms, and scintigraphy, as well as the evolving use of CT and MR imaging in evaluating suspected complications. Developments in CT postprocessing and MR pulse sequence design now allow successful imaging of soft tissues adjacent to hardware components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eustace et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: