Key result
Dantrolene fails to reduce ventricular premature beats or VF inducibility in ischemia-reperfusion hearts.
Why the study?
Does dantrolene suppress ventricular premature beats and ventricular fibrillation inducibility in isolated regional ischemia-reperfusion rabbit hearts with or without pacing-induced heart failure?
Does dantrolene suppress ventricular premature beats and ventricular fibrillation inducibility in isolated regional ischemia-reperfusion rabbit hearts with or without pacing-induced heart failure?
In isolated rabbit hearts with regional ischemia-reperfusion injury, dantrolene failed to suppress ventricular premature beats or reduce VF inducibility in either failing or non-failing hearts due to competing antiarrhythmic (APD/ERP prolongation) and proarrhythmic (conduction slowing and enhanced alternans) effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dantrolene shows no antiarrhythmic benefit in this rabbit model; leaves open its role in other arrhythmia substrates or species.
Dantrolene was reported to suppress ventricular fibrillation (VF) in failing hearts with acute myocardial infarction, but its antiarrhythmic efficacy in regional ischemia-reperfusion (IR) hearts remains debatable. Heart failure (HF) was induced by right ventricular pacing. The IR rabbit model was created by coronary artery ligation for 30 min, followed by reperfusion for 15 min in vivo in both HF and non-HF groups (n = 9 in each group). Simultaneous voltage and intracellular Ca(2+) (Cai) optical mapping was then performed in isolated Langendorff-perfused hearts. Electrophysiological studies were conducted and VF inducibility was evaluated by dynamic pacing. Dantrolene (10 μM) was administered after baseline studies. The HF group had a higher VF inducibility than the control group. Dantrolene had both antiarrhythmic (prolonged action potential duration (APD) and effective refractory period) and proarrhythmic effects (slowed conduction velocity, steepened APD restitution slope, and enhanced arrhythmogenic alternans induction) but had no significant effects on ventricular premature beat (VPB) suppression and VF inducibility in both groups. A higher VF conversion rate in the non-HF group was likely due to greater APD prolonging effects in smaller hearts compared to the HF group. The lack of significant effects on VPB suppression by dantrolene suggests that triggered activity might not be the dominant mechanism responsible for VPB induction in the IR model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chou et al. (2015) studied Regional ischemia-reperfusion injury with or without pacing-induced heart failure in isolated rabbit hearts (n=18). Dantrolene vs. Baseline pre-infusion state (and comparison between HF and non-HF groups) was evaluated on Ventricular fibrillation (VF) inducibility in the heart failure group (p=NS). Dantrolene (10 μM) did not significantly reduce VPB burden (P>0.05) or VF inducibility in failing (7/9 vs 7/9, P=NS) or non-failing (6/9 vs 2/9, P=0.125) ischemia-reperfusion rabbit hearts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: