Key result
Both peroral and intracerebroventricular clonidine administration lowered blood pressure to a similar extent in hypertensive rats, but only central administration reduced the sympathetic blood pressure component.
Why the study?
The chronic antihypertensive effects of alpha2-adrenergic agonists in low-renin or high-renin experimental hypertension had not been studied, and mechanisms underlying blood pressure reduction from chronic peroral versus intracerebroventricular clonidine were uncompared.
Does chronic intracerebroventricular or peroral clonidine administration reduce blood pressure in rats with salt-dependent or angiotensin II-dependent hypertension?
Does chronic intracerebroventricular or peroral clonidine administration reduce blood pressure in rats with salt-dependent or angiotensin II-dependent hypertension?
p-value: p=<0.05
Chronic central and systemic clonidine administration lower blood pressure to a similar extent but via different mechanisms in low-renin and high-renin rat models of hypertension.
Chronic α2-agonist effects in Dahl rats should not guide practice; leaves open central versus peripheral mechanisms in experimental hypertension.
The agonists of α2-adrenergic receptors such as clonidine, rilmenidine or monoxidine are known to lower blood pressure (BP) through a reduction of brain sympathetic outflow but their chronic antihypertensive effects in rats with low-renin or high-renin forms of experimental hypertension were not studied yet. Moreover, there is no comparison of mechanisms underlying BP reduction elicited by chronic peroral (po) or intracerebroventricular (icv) clonidine treatment. Male salt-sensitive Dahl rats fed 4% NaCl diet and Ren-2 transgenic rats were treated with clonidine administered either in the drinking fluid (0.5 mg/kg/day po) or as the infusion into lateral brain ventricle (0.1 mg/kg/day icv) for 4 weeks. Basal BP and the contributions of renin-angiotensin system (captopril 10 mg/kg iv) or sympathetic nervous system (pentolinium 5 mg/kg iv) to BP maintenance were determined in conscious cannulated rats at the end of the study. Both peroral and intracerebroventricular clonidine treatment lowered BP to the same extent in either rat model. However, in both models chronic clonidine treatment reduced sympathetic BP component only in rats treated intracerebroventricularly but not in perorally treated animals. In contrast, peroral clonidine treatment reduced angiotensin II-dependent vasoconstriction in Ren-2 transgenic rats, whereas it lowered residual blood pressure in Dahl rats. In conclusions, our results indicate different mechanisms of antihypertensive action of clonidine when administered centrally or systemically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zicha et al. (2022) studied Salt-dependent or Angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Clonidine vs. Control was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p=<0.05). Both peroral and intracerebroventricular clonidine administration lowered blood pressure to a similar extent in hypertensive rats, but only central administration reduced the sympathetic blood pressure component.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: