This historical review traces the recognition of congenital absence of the pericardium from early disputed cases in 1559 to definitive descriptions in 1788.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers historical context for congenital pericardial defects; extends recognition timeline but leaves open modern clinical relevance.
Cases of total or partial absence of the pericardium in human beings with complete closure of the thoracic wall have been recorded in the literature as far back as 1559. In this year, Realdus Columbus¹described the case of a young student at Rome who died in a state of syncope. Absence of the pericardium was noted at necropsy. The genuineness of this case, however, was subsequently doubted by some writers, who believed that the appearance of an adherent pericardium had been mistaken for an absence of this membrane altogether. During the next two hundred years, a few cases were reported, but the descriptions were very imperfect. Doubt of the existence of the defect persisted, and it was not until 1788, when Baillie²gave a detailed description of a case, that the existence of the condition was established beyond all doubt. Since this report, surprisingly few cases have
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richmond L. Moore (1925) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: