Key result
A deep learning neural network for automated LGE-CMR image segmentation achieved a mean scar burden difference of 2% compared to manual expert segmentations.
Why the study?
Segmentation and fibrosis quantification from LGE-CMR is intensive, manual, and prone to interobserver variability, creating an unmet need for automated segmentation ensuring anatomical accuracy.
Does a 3-stage deep neural network provide accurate automated myocardium and scar/fibrosis segmentation on LGE-CMR compared to manual expert segmentation?
Does a 3-stage deep neural network provide accurate automated myocardium and scar/fibrosis segmentation on LGE-CMR compared to manual expert segmentation?
Mean Difference: 2
A novel deep neural network can automatically segment myocardium and scar/fibrosis on LGE-CMR, allowing for the direct calculation of clinical measures like scar burden with accuracy comparable to manual expert segmentation.
May ease manual LGE-CMR fibrosis quantification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Visualizing fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with contrast enhancement (late gadolinium enhancement; LGE) is paramount in characterizing disease progression and identifying arrhythmia substrates. Segmentation and fibrosis quantification from LGE-CMR is intensive, manual, and prone to interobserver variability. There is an unmet need for automated LGE-CMR image segmentation that ensures anatomical accuracy and seamless extraction of clinical features. Objective: This study aimed to develop a novel deep learning solution for analysis of contrast-enhanced CMR images that produces anatomically accurate myocardium and scar/fibrosis segmentations and uses these to calculate features of clinical interest. Methods: Data sources were 155 2-dimensional LGE-CMR patient scans (1124 slices) and 246 synthetic "LGE-like" scans (1360 slices) obtained from cine CMR using a novel style-transfer algorithm. We trained and tested a 3-stage neural network that identified the left ventricle (LV) region of interest (ROI), segmented ROI into viable myocardium and regions of enhancement, and postprocessed the segmentation results to enforce conforming to anatomical constraints. The segmentations were used to directly compute clinical features, such as LV volume and scar burden. Results: 57 Dice coefficient when compared to trained expert segmentations. The mean scar burden difference between manual and predicted segmentations was 2%. Conclusion: We developed and validated a deep neural network for automatic, anatomically accurate expert-level LGE- CMR myocardium and scar/fibrosis segmentation, allowing direct calculation of clinical measures. Given the training set heterogeneity, our approach could be extended to multiple imaging modalities and patient pathologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popescu et al. (2021) studied Myocardial scar and fibrosis (n=155). Deep learning neural network for LGE-CMR segmentation vs. Manual expert segmentation was evaluated on Mean scar burden difference (Mean difference 2%). A deep learning neural network for automated LGE-CMR image segmentation achieved a mean scar burden difference of 2% compared to manual expert segmentations.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: