Key result
A nationwide survey in Japan identified 18 regional collaborative clinical pathways for acute coronary syndrome, with 11 (23%) prefectures having prefecture-wide and 4 (9%) having region-wide pathways.
Why the study?
Maintaining guideline-directed medical therapy across institutions remains challenging, making the evaluation of the prevalence and functionality of regional collaborative clinical pathways for ACS in Japan important.
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
Regional collaborative clinical pathways for ACS are established in only about one-third of Japanese prefectures, with few meeting functional criteria for intensive secondary prevention.
Variable ACS pathway adoption in Japan signals coordination gaps; leaves open outcome impact and need for prospective evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requires seamless treatment across institutions, including intensive care centers and local clinics. However, maintaining guideline-directed medical therapy remains challenging. One promising option to improve the situation may be the implementation of regional collaborative clinical pathways. This study evaluated the prevalence and functionality of such pathways for ACS in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: A nationwide survey was conducted through questionnaires and web searches, targeting all 47 prefectural managers of Japanese Circulation Association (JCA) branches. The study focused on pathways managed at the prefectural or regional levels, excluding inactive or institutional pathways. In all, 18 pathways were identified: 11 (23%) prefecture wide and 4 (9%) region wide. Most pathways included risk factor targets such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HbA1c, and blood pressure, but only 8 pathways set an LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. Pathways updated between 2022 and 2024 and incorporating LDL-C management protocols were considered functional. In all, 45 JCA branches viewed future ACS pathways established by the government or academic societies as potentially useful resources. CONCLUSIONS: Regional collaborative clinical pathways for ACS patients in Japan show variable implementation across prefectures, with approximately one-third of prefectures having established pathways. Future efforts should prioritize the establishment of comprehensive, sustainable, and standardized pathways to optimize ACS management and improve patient outcomes nationwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minami et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=47). Regional collaborative clinical pathways was evaluated on Prevalence of regional collaborative clinical pathways for ACS. A nationwide survey in Japan identified 18 regional collaborative clinical pathways for acute coronary syndrome, with 11 (23%) prefectures having prefecture-wide and 4 (9%) having region-wide pathways.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: