Key result
In a review of 19,161 patients, perioperative beta-blockers reduced arrhythmias in cardiac surgery but increased mortality and stroke in non-cardiac surgery despite reducing myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Randomized controlled trials had yielded conflicting results regarding the impact of beta-blockers on perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Does perioperative use of beta-blockers reduce mortality and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery?
Systematic Review (n=19,161)
Does perioperative use of beta-blockers reduce mortality and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery?
Perioperative beta-blockers are beneficial for reducing arrhythmias in cardiac surgery but are not recommended for routine use in non-cardiac surgery due to an increased risk of mortality and stroke.
Perioperative beta-blockers reduce events in cardiac surgery; extends conflicting RCT data and supports targeted use while non-cardiac surgery evidence remains mixed.
Randomized controlled trials have yielded conflicting results regarding the impact of beta-blockers on perioperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This Cochrane systematic review assessed the impact of this intervention on mortality and cardiovascular events. Eighty-eight randomized controlled trials with 19 161 participants were included (53 trials on cardiac surgery and 35 trials on non-cardiac surgery). In cardiac surgery perioperative beta-blockers had a protective effect against supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias but had no significant effect on mortality or on the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, heart failure, hypotension or bradycardia. In non-cardiac surgery, beta-blockers had a protective effect against AMI and arrhythmias, but this was counterbalanced by an increased risk of death and stroke. In conclusion, perioperative use of beta-blockers appears overall to be beneficial in cardiac surgery. However, in non-cardiac surgery the substantial reduction in rhythm disturbances and AMI appears to be offset by an increase in mortality and stroke, and so the systematic use of beta-blockers in this setting is not recommended. Os resultados de ensaios clínicos aleatorizados relativos à utilização de betabloqueantes no período perioperatório de cirurgia cardíaca e não cardíaca têm sido controversos. Esta revisão sistemática da Cochrane avaliou o impacto dessa intervenção na mortalidade e eventos cardiovasculares peri-operatórios. Foram incluídos 88 ensaios clínicos aleatorizados com um total de 19 161 participantes (53 ensaios com cirurgia cardíaca e 35 com cirurgia não cardíaca). A utilização perioperatória de betabloqueantes na cirurgia cardíaca reduziu significativamente a ocorrência de disritmias supraventriculares e ventriculares, sem impacto significativo na mortalidade, bem como no risco de enfarte agudo do miocárdio (EAM), acidente vascular cerebral (AVC), insuficiência cardíaca, hipotensão e bradicardia. Por outro lado, na cirurgia não cardíaca, apesar de existir uma redução no risco de EAM e nos eventos arrítmicos supraventriculares, esse efeito foi contrabalançado pelo aumento do risco de morte e AVC. Em conclusão, a utilização de betabloqueantes no período perioperatório de cirurgia cardíaca parece ser benéfica. Por outro lado, na cirurgia não cardíaca apesar da redução significativa de EAM e disritmias, há um aumento da mortalidade e de AVC, pelo que a utilização sistemática de betabloqueantes em doentes submetidos a cirurgia não cardíaca não está recomendada.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alegria et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac and non-cardiac surgery (n=19,161). Perioperative beta-blockers vs. Control was evaluated on Mortality and cardiovascular events. In a review of 19,161 patients, perioperative beta-blockers reduced arrhythmias in cardiac surgery but increased mortality and stroke in non-cardiac surgery despite reducing myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: