In this work, a Monte Carlo software package, PET-EGS, designed to simulate realistic PET clinical studies, was used to assess three different approaches to scatter correction in 3D PET: analytical (gaussian fitting technique), experimental (dual energy window technique) and probabilistic (Monte Carlo technique). Phantom and clinical studies were carried out by 3D PET and simulated by PET-EGS. A clinical study (/sup 18/F-FDG brain study) was simulated assuming PET emission/transmission multiple-volume images as a voxelised source object describing the distribution of both the radioactivity and attenuation coefficients and accounting for out-of-field activity and media. The accuracy of PET-EGS in modelling the physical response of a 3D PET scanner was assessed by statistical comparison between measured and total (scatter+unscatter) simulated distributions (probability for the two distributions to be the same distribution: p>0.95). The accuracy of the scatter models, for each scatter correction technique, was evaluated on sinograms by statistical comparison between the estimated and the simulated scatter distributions (agreement <1 /spl sigma/). The accuracy of scatter correction was evaluated on sinograms by comparison between scatter corrected and simulated unscatter distributions, proving a comparable accuracy of all the considered scatter correction techniques for brainlike distributed sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castiglioni et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: