Key result
HEAR pathway cuts second troponin testing by an absolute ~18% vs LoD strategy.
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop a decision pathway combining the HEAR score and 0 h hs-cTnT to safely avoid a second troponin test for suspected NSTEMI in emergency departments.
Does a Bayesian-derived HEAR pathway (HEAR score 0-2 plus 0 h hs-cTnT <14 ng/L) safely reduce the need for a second troponin test while ruling out index NSTEMI compared with the 0 h hs-cTnT <5 ng/L LoD strategy in emergency department patients with acute chest pain?
Cohort (n=7,131)
No
Does a Bayesian-derived HEAR pathway (HEAR score 0-2 plus 0 h hs-cTnT <14 ng/L) safely reduce the need for a second troponin test while ruling out index NSTEMI compared with the 0 h hs-cTnT <5 ng/L LoD strategy in emergency department patients with acute chest pain?
Combining a low-risk clinical HEAR score (0-2) with an initial 0-hour hs-cTnT <14 ng/L safely rules out NSTEMI in 21% of ED chest pain patients with 100% negative predictive value, reducing the need for a second troponin test by 18.2% compared with the standard <5 ng/L limit-of-detection cutoff.
May reduce repeat troponin testing in low-risk ED chest pain; leaves open randomized validation before practice change.
The study aims to develop a decision pathway based on HEAR score and 0 h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) to safely avoid a second troponin test for suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in emergency departments. A HEAR score consists of history, electrocardiogram, age, and risk factors. A HEAR pathway is established using a Bayesian approach based on a predefined safety threshold of NSTEMI prevalence in the rule-out group. In total, 7131 patients were retrospectively enrolled, 582 (8.2%) with index visit NSTEMI and 940 (13.2%) with 180-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). For patients with a low-risk HEAR score (0 to 2) and low 0 h hs-cTnT (<14 ng/L), the HEAR pathway recommends early discharge without further testing. After the HEAR pathway had been applied to rule out NSTEMI, the negative predictive value of index visit NSTEMI was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.8% to 100.0%) and false-negative rate of 180-day MACE was 0.40% (95% CI, 0.18% to 0.87%). Compared with the 0 h hs-cTnT < limit of detection (LoD) strategy (<5 ng/L), the HEAR pathway could correctly reclassify 1298 patients without MACE as low risk and lead to a 18.2% decrease (95% CI, 17.4-19.1%) in the need for a second troponin test. The HEAR pathway may lead to a substantial and safe reduction in repeated troponin test for emergency department patients with suspected NSTEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute chest pain with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=7,131). HEAR pathway (low-risk HEAR score 0-2 plus 0 h hs-cTnT < 14 ng/L) vs. 0 h hs-cTnT < limit of detection (< 5 ng/L) strategy, HEART pathway, and EDACS-ADP was evaluated on Rule-out of index visit NSTEMI at 0 hours (proportion ruled out and negative predictive value) (ARR 18.2%, 95% CI 17.4-19.1). The HEAR pathway ruled out index NSTEMI in 21.0% of chest pain patients with 100.0% NPV (95% CI 99.8-100.0%), reducing second troponin tests by 18.2% (95% CI 17.4-19.1%) vs the LoD strategy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: