Key result
Elite athletes completed significantly more high-intensity interval repetitions than moderately active females (7.8 vs 4.2 repetitions, p < 0.05), with performance primarily determined by post-exercise recovery rates of oxygen consumption and heart rate.
Why the study?
The physiological factors that determine tolerance to exertion during high-intensity interval effort were not well established.
What physiological factors determine tolerance to exertion during high-intensity interval effort in young female athletes and moderately active women?
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
No
What physiological factors determine tolerance to exertion during high-intensity interval effort in young female athletes and moderately active women?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.8% vs 4.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
The recovery rates for oxygen consumption and heart rate after an incremental test, along with muscle saturation index at exhaustion, are the major physiological factors related to high-intensity interval training performance.
Descriptive findings on HIIT tolerance in young women require validation; leaves open physiological determinants for targeted training.
This descriptive study aimed to explore the physiological factors that determine tolerance to exertion during high-intensity interval effort. Forty-seven young women (15-28 years old) were enrolled: 23 athletes from Taiwan national or national reserve teams and 24 moderately active females. Each participant underwent a maximal incremental INC (modified Bruce protocol) cardiopulmonary exercise test on the first day and high-intensity interval testing (HIIT) on the second day, both performed on a treadmill. The HIIT protocol involved alternation between 1-min effort at 120% of the maximal speed, at the same slope reached at the end of the INC, and 1-min rest until volitional exhaustion. Gas exchange, heart rate (HR), and muscle oxygenation at the right vastus lateralis, measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, were continuously recorded. The number of repetitions completed (Rlim) by each participant was considered the HIIT tolerance index. The results showed a large difference in the Rlim (range, 2.6-12.0 repetitions) among the participants. Stepwise linear regression revealed that the variance in the Rlim within the cohort was related to the recovery rates of oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]), HR at the second minute after INC, and muscle tissue saturation index at exhaustion (R = 0.644). In addition, age was linearly correlated with Rlim (adjusted R = -0.518, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the recovery rates for [Formula: see text] and HR after the incremental test, and muscle saturation index at exhaustion, were the major physiological factors related to HIIT performance. These findings provide insights into the role of the recovery phase after maximal INC exercise testing. Future research investigating a combination of INC and HIIT testing to determine training-induced performance improvement is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=47). Elite athlete status vs. Moderately active females was evaluated on Number of repetitions completed (Rlim) in high-intensity interval testing (p=<0.05). Elite athletes completed significantly more high-intensity interval repetitions than moderately active females (7.8 vs 4.2 repetitions, p < 0.05), with performance primarily determined by post-exercise recovery rates of oxygen consumption and heart rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: