Key result
Live oral rotavirus vaccines reduced severe rotavirus gastroenteritis by 30-60% in developing countries compared to >90% in industrialised countries.
Why the study?
What strategies can improve the effectiveness of oral rotavirus vaccines in developing countries?
What strategies can improve the effectiveness of oral rotavirus vaccines in developing countries?
This review highlights the efficacy gap of oral rotavirus vaccines between industrialized and developing countries and examines strategies to improve effectiveness in developing settings.
Disparate efficacy warrants region-specific strategies in developing countries; leaves open mechanisms and optimization of oral rotavirus vaccines.
Rotavirus gastroenteritis is a leading global cause of mortality and morbidity in young children due to diarrhea and dehydration. Over 85% of deaths occur in developing countries. In industrialised countries, 2 live oral rotavirus vaccines licensed in 2006 quickly demonstrated high effectiveness, dramatically reducing severe rotavirus gastroenteritis admissions in many settings by more than 90%. In contrast, the same vaccines reduced severe rotavirus gastroenteritis by only 30-60% in developing countries, but have been proven life-saving. Bridging this "efficacy gap" offers the possibility to save many more lives of children under the age of 5. The reduced efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in developing settings may be related to differences in transmission dynamics, as well as host luminal, mucosal and immune factors. This review will examine strategies currently under study to target the issue of reduced efficacy and effectiveness of oral rotavirus vaccines in developing settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tissera et al. (2016) conducted a review in Rotavirus gastroenteritis. Oral rotavirus vaccines was evaluated. Live oral rotavirus vaccines reduced severe rotavirus gastroenteritis by 30-60% in developing countries compared to >90% in industrialised countries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: