Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The role that cell-mediated immune responses play during cutaneous carcinogenesis has received little attention. In this study, we evaluated the contribution of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in C3H/HeN mice that were subjected to a two-stage 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) initiation, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) promotion skin carcinogenesis protocol. In CD8 knockout (CD8(-/-)) mice, allergic contact hypersensitivity to DMBA was reduced compared with wild-type (WT) C3H/HeN mice. On the other hand, CD4 knockout (CD4(-/-)) mice developed an exaggerated contact hypersensitivity response. CD4(+) T cells from DMBA contact-sensitized mice preferentially produced interleukin 4 (IL-4), IL-10, and IL-17; CD8(+) T cells, on the other hand, secreted IFN-gamma. When CD4(-/-), CD8(-/-), and WT mice were subjected to a standard two-stage DMBA/TPA cutaneous carcinogenesis protocol, the percentage of mice with tumors was much greater (P < 0.001) in CD8(-/-) mice than in WT mice. In contrast, the percentage of tumors was significantly less (P < 0.001) in CD4(-/-) mice than in WT mice. Similar results were obtained when the data were evaluated as the number of tumors per mouse. These findings indicate that (a) CD8(+) T cells are the predominant effector cells in allergic contact hypersensitivity to DMBA and that CD4(+) T cells have an inhibitory role and (b) the development of CD8(+) T cells plays a protective role in skin tumor development whereas CD4(+) T cells have the opposite effect. Manipulation of T-cell subpopulations that are induced by carcinogenic chemicals, like DMBA, could be a means of preventing skin cancers caused by these agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusuf et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: