Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The method of fitting a learnt and continually revised profile to X-ray diffraction step-scan measurements, previously described for protein crystals and a linear diffractometer, has been modified and extended for a wider range of samples and a four-circle diffractometer. Variation of peak width is dealt with by assuming an anisotropic functional form, the parameters for which are derived by least-squares refinement from measurements of selected strong reflexions. The effect of the α doublet on the reflexion shape is treated by an empirical method, which extracts α1 and α2 components from the observed profile with a minimum of assumptions. Several internal consistency tests are made to test the validity of the method for every measured reflexion, and possible errors are flagged. Application of the method enables a considerable increase in data-collection speed over conventional methods, without corresponding loss of precision. Typical rates of data collection by this method are 100 reflexions per hour, or 2-3 medium-sized structures per week, for a Stoe-Siemens AED diffractometer and a 2 kW tube (Mo Kα radiation, graphite monochromator).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. Clegg (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: