Key result
The alpha-index-surrogate based on pulse-to-pulse variability and pulse up-slope strongly correlated with the conventional alpha index (0.74 for LF band, 0.81 for HF band) and detected significant differences between rest and tilt stages.
Why the study?
Does a novel method using only pulse photoplethysmography (PPG) signals accurately assess baroreflex sensitivity compared to conventional ECG and continuous blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=17)
Does a novel method using only pulse photoplethysmography (PPG) signals accurately assess baroreflex sensitivity compared to conventional ECG and continuous blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: Spearman correlation 0.81 (HF band) and 0.74 (LF band)
p-value: p=<0.05
Baroreflex sensitivity changes induced by a tilt test can be assessed with high correlation using only a PPG signal, potentially enabling ambulatory monitoring without the need for continuous blood pressure recording.
May enable simpler BRS monitoring; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
Novel methods for assessing baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using only pulse photoplethysmography (PPG) signals are presented. Proposed methods were evaluated with a data set containing electrocardiogram (ECG), blood pressure (BP), and PPG signals from 17 healthy subjects during a tilt table test. The methods are based on a surrogate of α index, which is defined as the power ratio of RR interval variability (RRV) and that of systolic arterial pressure series variability (SAPV). The proposed α index surrogates use pulse-to-pulse interval series variability (PPV) as a surrogate of RRV, and different morphological features of the PPG pulse which have been hypothesized to be related to BP, as series surrogates of SAPV. A time-frequency technique was used to assess BRS, taking into account the non-stationarity of the protocol. This technique identifies two time-varying frequency bands where RRV and SAPV (or their surrogates) are expected to be coupled: the low frequency (LF, inside 0.04-0.15 Hz range), and the high frequency (HF, inside 0.15-0.4 Hz range) bands. Furthermore, time-frequency coherence is used to identify the time intervals when the RRV and SAPV (or their surrogates) are coupled. Conventional α index based on RRV and SAPV was used as Gold Standard. Spearman correlation coefficients between conventional α index and its PPG-based surrogates were computed and the paired Wilcoxon statistical test was applied in order to assess whether the indices can find significant differences (p<0.05) between different stages of the protocol. The highest correlations with the conventional α index were obtained by the α-index-surrogate based on PPV and pulse up-slope (PUS), with 0.74 for LF band, and 0.81 for HF band. Furthermore, this index found significant differences between rest stages and tilt stage in both LF and HF bands according to the paired Wilcoxon test, as the conventional α index also did. These results suggest that BRS changes induced by the tilt test can be assessed with high correlation by only a PPG signal using PPV as RRV surrogate, and PPG morphological features as SAPV surrogates, being PUS the most convenient SAPV surrogate among the studied ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lázaro et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=17). Pulse photoplethysmography (PPG) based surrogates of alpha index vs. Conventional alpha index based on ECG and continuous blood pressure was evaluated on Spearman correlation between conventional alpha index and PPG-based surrogates (Spearman correlation 0.81 (HF band) and 0.74 (LF band), p=<0.05). The alpha-index-surrogate based on pulse-to-pulse variability and pulse up-slope strongly correlated with the conventional alpha index (0.74 for LF band, 0.81 for HF band) and detected significant differences between rest and tilt stages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: