Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A variant of compressional optical coherence elastography for mapping of the relative stiffness of biological tissues is reported. Unlike conventionally discussed displacement-based (DB) elastography, in which the decrease in the cross-correlation between subsequently obtained images is a negative factor causing errors in the mapping displacement and strain fields, we propose to intentionally use the difference in the correlation stability (CS) for deformed-tissue regions with different stiffnesses. We compare the parameter ranges (in terms of noise-to-signal ratio and strain) in which the conventional DB and CS approaches are operable. It is shown that the CS approach has advantages such as a significantly wider operability region in terms of strain and is more tolerant to noise. This is favorable for freehand implementation of the CS approach. Examples of simulated and real CS-based elastographic optical coherence tomography images are given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaitsev et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: