Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusions aims to relieve symptoms, improve left ventricular function, and potentially improve survival.
This review highlights the indications and technical advancements for PCI in chronic total coronary occlusions despite the lack of randomized comparisons with conservative therapy.
May support symptom relief as CTO PCI goal; leaves open survival and LV function benefits without RCTs.
A chronically occluded coronary lesion is observed in approximately 20–30% of patients in whom the diagnosis of coronary artery disease is established by coronary angiography. By contrast, a chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) as a target of a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constitutes less than 10% of the PCI volume in current practice. This discrepancy is explained in part by the specific technical challenges posed by a CTO with a low primary success rate, and a high lesion recurrence rate. The latter is addressed by the use of drug-eluting stents, and the former is improved considerably with recent technical advancements and specialization of operators. There are three principal indications to revascularize a CTO, which are the relief of clinical symptoms, the improvement of impaired left ventricular function, and a potential improvement in survival. Despite the absence of a randomized clinical comparison between conservative and interventional treatment of CTOs, numerous nonrandomized stu...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerald S. Werner (2011) conducted a review in Chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Conservative treatment was evaluated. Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusions aims to relieve symptoms, improve left ventricular function, and potentially improve survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: