Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains a debated revascularization strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease?
This review discusses the ongoing debate regarding the optimal revascularization strategy (PCI vs CABG) for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Revascularization choice in multivessel CAD requires individualized assessment; leaves open need for contemporary randomized comparisons of PCI and CABG.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one manifestation of ischemic heart disease, which is the leading cause of mortality in the world. In addition to preventive medical therapy and lifestyle changes, consideration of revascularization of obstructed arteries to reduce ischemia, alleviate angina, and improve quality of life is a mainstay of current practice. However, the benefits of different methods of revascularization in particular patient populations are debated. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which involves placement of intracoronary stents in most patients, is a less invasive procedure than coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Although it is generally accepted that patients with single-vessel obstructive CAD are best treated with PCI, patients with multivessel CAD have a higher ischemia burden, a greater risk for developing recurrent ischemic events, and a higher mortality. It is in this patient population where the debate over revascularization with stents versus surgery continues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (2009) conducted a review in Coronary Artery Disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was evaluated. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains a debated revascularization strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: