A Review of the pharmacokinetics, Electrophysiology and Clinical Efficacy of Dronedarone

The results of major clinical trials and advances in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies are continuing to alter treatment approaches for both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Originally developed as an antianginal medication, amiodarone serves as the most effective antiarrhythmic drug in the treatment of both atrial and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. However, amiodarone has complex pharmacokinetics and is associated with serious extracardiac side effects, partially due to the presence of an iodine moiety. With a better understanding of the mechanisms of arrhythmias and antiarrhythmic drugs, new antiarrhythmic agents are currently under development with the hope that they will be more effective and safer than currently available drugs. One such drug that might potentially fulfill this hope is dronedarone. This amiodarone-like compound lacks the iodine moiety, and is similar in structure and electrophysiologic mechanisms of action to amiodarone, to date no evidence of liver, thyroid or pulmonary toxicity has been reported. Three clinical trials demonstrate efficacy in suppressing recurrences of atrial fibrillation and there is also evidence of a rate-slowing benefit during atrial fibrillation/flutter. However, the ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure Evaluating morbidity Decrease (ANDROMEDA) study, performed in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, demonstrated excess noncardiac mortality in patients treated with dronedarone. Although effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, the future of this novel amiodarone-like drug remains uncertain until further clarification of the excess mortality in heart failure patients is better studied.