Key result
Catheter ablation significantly improved TICS-m cognitive function scores at 12 months compared to drug therapy (39.56 vs 34.44, p<0.001) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation may exacerbate cognitive dysfunction, but changes in cognitive function following treatment with different ablation methods remained to be prospectively analyzed.
Does catheter ablation improve cognitive function compared to drug therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=139)
No
Does catheter ablation improve cognitive function compared to drug therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.56% vs 34.44%
p-value: p=<.001
Observational data suggest possible cognitive stabilization after AF ablation; leaves open whether ablation methods differ in randomized trials.
Atrial fibrillation is considered to be the most common arrhythmia in the clinic, and it gradually increases with age. In recent years, there has been increasing evidence that atrial fibrillation may exacerbate the progression of cognitive dysfunction. The current guidelines recommend ablation for drug-refractory atrial fibrillation.We aimed to prospectively analyze changes in cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation following treatment using different ablation methods.A total of 139 patients, with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, were included in the study. The patients were divided into the drug therapy (n = 41) and catheter ablation (n = 98) groups, with the catheter ablation group further subdivided into radiofrequency ablation (n = 68) and cryoballoon (CY) ablation (n = 30). We evaluated cognitive function at baseline, 3- and 12-months follow-up using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) test, then analyzed differences in cognitive function between the drug therapy and catheter ablation groups, to reveal the effect of the different ablation methods.We observed a significantly higher TICS-m score (39.56 ± 3.198) in the catheter ablation group at 12-month follow-up (P < .001), than the drug treatment group was. Additionally, we found no statistically significant differences in TICS-m scores between the radiofrequency ablation and CY groups at 3- and 12-month postoperatively (P > .05), although the two subgroups showed statistically significant cognitive function (P < .001).Overall, these findings indicated that radiofrequency and CY ablation improve cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=139). Catheter ablation vs. Drug therapy was evaluated on Cognitive function at 12-months follow-up assessed by TICS-m score (p=<.001). Catheter ablation significantly improved TICS-m cognitive function scores at 12 months compared to drug therapy (39.56 vs 34.44, p<0.001) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: