Key result
Custodiol cardioplegia was associated with lower immediate postoperative troponin elevation (8.46 vs 10.08) and fewer required DC shocks (36% vs 68%) compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia.
Why the study?
A one-dose approach for myocardial safety is attractive in long operations, but differences in myocardial protection between Custodiol and cold crystalloid cardioplegia during double valve replacement surgery needed assessment.
Does Custodiol cardioplegia improve myocardial protection and post-operative recovery compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in patients undergoing double valve replacement surgery?
Cohort (n=50)
Does Custodiol cardioplegia improve myocardial protection and post-operative recovery compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in patients undergoing double valve replacement surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.46% vs 10.08%
Custodiol cardioplegia may offer superior myocardial protection and shorter recovery times compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in patients undergoing double valve replacement.
Cold crystalloid may confer better protection in double valve surgery; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Background: Myocardial protection refers to strategies used to avoid post-ischemic myocardial dysfunction. One dose approach for myocardial safety is attractive in long operations. Purpose: to assess differences among the custodial cardioplegia and the cold crystalloid cardioplegia according to myocardial protection in cases listed for Double Valve Replacement Surgery. Patient and methods: This prospective cohort trial included 50 cases had double valve replacement surgery between August 2017 and July 2019. Twenty-nine patients were males (58%), and the mean age was 57.66±8.81 years. The mean ejection fraction was 41.43±9.25 %. Results: The mean CPB time in custodial group was 99.4±8.46 while in cold crystalloid cardioplegia group was 95.6±12.27 minutes. The mean DC shocks that was required in custodial group was 9(36%) while in cold crystalloid cardioplegia group was 17 (68%) times. Mean days of ICU stay in custodial group were 1.28±0.46 while in cold crystalloid cardioplegia group were 1.72±0.61 days. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation in custodial group was 4.64±0.86 while in cold crystalloid cardioplegia group was 7.04±0.84 hours. Troponin elevation mean in the immediate post-operative: in custodiol group was 8.46±2.21 while in the cold crystalloid group was 10.08±2.18. Conclusion: This study showed that the evidence supporting the superiority of custodial over cold crystalloid cardioplegia are limited however, Custodiol cardioplegia is appealing as it gives lengthy myocardial protection with a single-dose. The present work demonstrated that Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate cardioplegia is related with less ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, postoperative hospitalization and troponin T release in low-risk patients who had double valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
okba et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Double Valve Replacement Surgery (n=50). Custodiol (Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate) cardioplegia vs. Modified St. Thomas Cold Crystalloid Cardioplegia was evaluated on Troponin elevation in the immediate post-operative period. Custodiol cardioplegia was associated with lower immediate postoperative troponin elevation (8.46 vs 10.08) and fewer required DC shocks (36% vs 68%) compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: