Key result
Custodiol cardioplegia resulted in a significantly higher rate of return to spontaneous rhythm compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia (56% vs 28%; p=0.045) during mitral valve replacement.
Why the study?
Cardioplegia is widely used to arrest and protect myocardial function during open-heart surgery, but comparative evaluation of Custodiol (HTK) versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia on myocardial protection in mitral valve replacement was needed.
Does Custodiol (HTK) cardioplegia improve myocardial protection compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgeries?
RCT (n=50)
randomly divided
Does Custodiol (HTK) cardioplegia improve myocardial protection compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgeries?
Absolute Event Rate: 56% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.045
Custodiol cardioplegia provides better myocardial protection than cold crystalloid cardioplegia during mitral valve replacement surgeries, evidenced by higher rates of spontaneous rhythm return and lower cardioplegia volume.
Favors Custodiol over cold crystalloid for myocardial protection in mitral valve replacement; extends RCT evidence on cardioplegia choice.
Background: Cardioplegia is the solution used to arrest and protect myocardial function during cardiac surgery. Cardioplegia is widely used in open-heart surgery. Myocardial protection is a critical approach to reduce the myocardial complications that occur during and after cardiac surgery. Aim: This study was designed to assess the use of custodial (HTK) versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia (Saint-Thomas) on myocardial protection in mitral valve replacement surgeries. METHODS: A total 50 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgeries (MVR) aged 25 to 60 years, ASA class II-III was randomly divided into two equal groups: Custodiol (HTK group, n =25) or cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CCC group, n =25) to produce cardiac arrest. RESULT: No significant difference was identified intraoperatively in (ACC time, CPB time, duration of surgery) but there was a significantly higher number of return to a spontaneous rhythm in the custodiol compared to CCC group (56% versus 28%; p = 0.045) and low volume in the HTK group (1412.1 ± 108.7 vs. 1782.9 ± 214.7; p = 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in CK-MB and troponin I preoperative or postoperatively, but there was a higher increase in their level at 24 h and 48h postoperative in the CCC group versus HTK group. Duration of inotropic support postoperatively significantly higher in the CCC group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of custodiol is effective than cold crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection in mitral valve replacement surgeries Keywords: Mitral valve surgeries; custodial; crystalloid cardioplegia; myocardial protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohamed Attia Elkahely (2020) conducted an RCT in Mitral valve replacement (n=50). Custodiol (HTK) cardioplegia vs. Cold crystalloid cardioplegia (Saint-Thomas) was evaluated on Return to spontaneous rhythm (p=0.045). Custodiol cardioplegia resulted in a significantly higher rate of return to spontaneous rhythm compared to cold crystalloid cardioplegia (56% vs 28%; p=0.045) during mitral valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: