Why the study?
Does histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) cardioplegia solution reduce 6 h post-ischemia cTn-I levels compared to standard extracellular multidose cardioplegia in isolated coronary bypass patients?
Does histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) cardioplegia solution reduce 6 h post-ischemia cTn-I levels compared to standard extracellular multidose cardioplegia in isolated coronary bypass patients?
In patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass, HTK cardioplegia solution resulted in higher 6-hour post-ischemia troponin I levels and more adverse events compared to standard Plegisol.
Favors Plegisol over HTK in isolated CABG; challenges HTK adoption and supports standard multidose solutions.
BACKGROUND: While considered simple and effective, crystalloid antegrade cardioplegia solutions have had few prospective multicentre comparison trials. METHODS: A commercial intracellular-type histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) cardioplegia solution (Custodiol HTK; Köhler Chemie GmbH, Germany) designed for 4 h of protection after a single administration was compared with a standard extracellular multidose product (Plegisol [PL]; Hospira Inc, USA) in an open-label, randomized, prospective seven-institution trial. A total of 136 isolated coronary bypass patients were randomly assigned into two groups and stratified by ejection fraction into categories of 40% or greater (n=118) and 20% to 39% (n=18). RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 62 years, of which 94% were men. Seventy per cent of patients had Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III angina and 75% had three-vessel disease anatomy. Cross-clamp times were nearly identical for patients in both cardioplegia groups; however, defibrillation was needed less often for patients who were treated with HTK (64% versus 91%, P<0.01). Hospital and intensive care unit stays, creatine kinase isoenzyme MB curves, cardiac outputs, inotrope levels, and deaths or serious adverse events (PL=13, HTK=14) were very similar between groups. Logistic regression showed that myocardial infarction or possible treatment-related adverse events were associated with high cardiac troponin I (cTn-I) levels 6 h after the procedure (P=0.001), and HTK treatment (OR 3.5, P=0.01). The primary study end point (6 h post-ischemia cTn-I) favoured PL (16.7±13.2 μg/L versus 20.3±13.5 μg/L, P=0.01). Patients who underwent circumflex grafting had higher cTn-I levels with HTK (P<0.001) and 48% required reinfusions due to cardiac warming. Longer intervals between doses correlated with high cTn-I levels (P=0.02). HTK provided prolonged protection with low cTn-I release (10 μg/L or less), although this occurred less frequently than with PL (17 versus 27 patients, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: HTK caused more structural protein release and adverse events than PL, even when reinfusion was implemented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demmy et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: