Key result
Heart rate variability measures, specifically sample entropy, were associated with the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.43-0.59).
Why the study?
Heart rate variability measures offer insight into autonomic regulation and may have predictive potential to optimize prehospital triage in critically ill patients.
Do heart rate variability measures predict the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions in critically ill patients during helicopter transport?
Cohort (n=4,521)
Do heart rate variability measures predict the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions in critically ill patients during helicopter transport?
Odds Ratio: 0.5 (95% CI 0.43–0.59)
Heart rate variability measures, particularly sample entropy, can help predict the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions in critically ill patients during helicopter transport.
HRV measures may enhance prehospital triage during helicopter transport; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background : Heart rate variability (HRV) measures give insight into the autonomic regulation of cardiac function in healthy and critically ill patients. The ease and predictive potential of HRV measures may be valuable in optimizing prehospital triage. In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that HRV measures, specifically sample entropy, measured early in emergency transport would predict the need for a prehospital lifesaving intervention (LSI) in a large, heterogeneous cohort of critically ill patients. Methods : We obtained patient records from a large helicopter critical care transport service. Continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) data were processed and screened for signal artifacts. Time, frequency, and complexity domain HRV measures were calculated and averaged. Multivariable logistic regression models and t tests were constructed to establish associations between selected HRV measures and the need for a prehospital LSI, adjusting for demography and case characteristics including patient age, sex, scene run, and trauma/nontrauma. A suite of machine learning algorithms was applied to optimize prediction of outcome measures. Results : A total of 4,521 cases were included for analysis. Of all patients, 68.8% of patients received prehospital LSI. Sample entropy, as well as other HRV measures, was associated with reception of prehospital LSI (OR 0.50, 95% CI [0.43, 0.59]). Gradient boosting and random forest algorithms showed the best performance in predicting LSI (AUROC scores = 0.78-0.79). Conclusions : Certain HRV measures are associated with prehospital LSI. Subsequent studies should focus on clinical utility and actionable thresholds for triage and initiation of LSIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Defilippi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Critically ill patients (n=4,521). Heart rate variability (HRV) measures (sample entropy) was evaluated on Need for a prehospital lifesaving intervention (LSI) (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.43-0.59). Heart rate variability measures, specifically sample entropy, were associated with the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.43-0.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: