Key result
The quick Pitt bacteremia score (qPitt) predicted 30-day mortality in patients with K. pneumoniae infection with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89), similar to the standard PBS (p=0.65).
Why the study?
Klebsiella pneumoniae causes nosocomial infections with poor prognosis, and the prognostic value of the recently developed quick Pitt bacteremia score in this population was unknown.
Does the qPitt score accurately predict 30-day mortality compared to PBS, SOFA, and qSOFA in hospitalized patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae infection?
Observational (n=867)
Does the qPitt score accurately predict 30-day mortality compared to PBS, SOFA, and qSOFA in hospitalized patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae infection?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89)
p-value: p=0.65
The qPitt score is a simplified and effective tool for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae infection, performing similarly to the standard PBS and better than qSOFA.
qPitt may aid prognostication in K. pneumoniae infections; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Purpose: Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important causative pathogen of nosocomial infections, resulting in poor prognosis owing to its hypervirulence and antibiotic resistance. A simplified quicker version of the Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) (qPitt) for acute illness severity measurement was developed recently. The goal of this study was to explore the prognostic value of qPitt in patients with K. pneumoniae infection. Patients and Methods: Demographic information and management strategies were retrospectively collected from the records of all adult patients who visited the emergency department between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, with culture-positive K. pneumoniae . The qPitt score was calculated based on: temperature < 36°C, systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg or vasopressor administration, respiratory rate ≥ 25 times/min or need of mechanical ventilation, altered mental status, and cardiac arrest event. The 30-day mortality prediction abilities of the qPitt were compared with the PBS, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Data from 867 patients (57.8% men) with a mean age of 66.9 were compiled. The 30-day mortality rate of the enrolled patients was 13.4%, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring systems were as follows: SOFA, 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.89– 0.93), qPitt, 0.87 (95% CI=0.84– 0.89), PBS, 0.87 (95% CI=0.85– 0.89), and qSOFA, 0.73 (95% CI=0.70– 0.76). The AUC of qPitt was significantly higher than that of qSOFA ( p < 0.01) and similar to that of PBS ( p =0.65).The qPitt also demonstrated excellent mortality discrimination ability in non-bacteremic patients, AUC= 0.85 (95% CI=0.82– 0.88). Conclusion: The qPitt revealed excellent 30-day mortality prediction ability and also predicted mortality in non-bacteremic patients with K. pneumoniae infection. Clinicians can use this simplified scoring system to stratify patients earlier and initiate prompt treatment in high-risk patients. Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae , organ dysfunction scores, bacteremia, prognosis A Letter to the Editor has been published for this article . A Response to Letter by Mrs Yang has been published for this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Klebsiella pneumoniae infection (n=867). quick Pitt bacteremia score (qPitt) vs. Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), SOFA, and qSOFA was evaluated on 30-day mortality prediction (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.89, p=0.65). The quick Pitt bacteremia score (qPitt) predicted 30-day mortality in patients with K. pneumoniae infection with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89), similar to the standard PBS (p=0.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: