Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to assess the scan delay and the effect of flow rates on arterial phase scanning of hepatic CT. METHOD: One hundred twenty patients suspected of having hepatocellular carcinoma were examined by three-phase helical CT using computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology. We set the region of interest (ROI) in the abdominal aorta at the level of the celiac artery as a baseline. The triggering threshold was set at 100 HU. A volume of 100 ml of iomeprol (350 mg of I/ml) was administered at 2, 2.5, or 3 ml/s i.v. RESULTS: In all cases, helical CT scanning began after reaching the ROI threshold. Then, portal venous phase scanning was initiated 50 s after arterial phase initiation. The mean delay time from the initiation of contrast agent administration to the beginning of arterial phase scanning was 29.2 +/- 3.8 s (mean +/- SD, range 22-39 s). A faster injection rate significantly shortened the scan delay (p < 0.01). In portal venous phase scanning, calculated areas under the hepatic enhancement curves were almost equal among different injection rates. CONCLUSION: The computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology is a useful method for determining an individual scan delay of arterial phase CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: