Review reveals the complementarity of three major acid-base frameworks in human blood, suggesting that correcting erroneous assumptions reconciles competing physiological models.
a day from the tissues to the lungs. The blood pH is maintained constant by several buffers, whose interplay is complex. The study of blood buffers is over a century old and has crossed major reinterpretations of the nature of acids and bases, from Arrhenius to Bronsted and Lowry, as well as an enormous evolution of our knowledge of protein structure, proteins being the most relevant among blood buffers. As a consequence, several theories have been developed to explain the physiological and pathological fluctuations of blood pH. This review compares the three main theories currently used: that based on the Strong Ions Difference (SID), due to Stewart and his followers; that based on the Base Excess, due to the Copenhagen school of respiration physiology; and the physiological one, due to the Boston school. These theories are not alternative but complementary and can be reconciled with each other, provided that some erroneous assumptions are corrected, and all three are expressed using the definitions proposed by Bronsted and Lowry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea Bellelli (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: