Why the study?
Although timely cardiovascular screening after preeclampsia is recommended, the optimal timing and methods remain to be determined, raising the question of how to optimize secondary prevention strategies.
Preeclampsia should be considered a first cardiovascular event in high-risk women, warranting early cardiovascular screening and secondary prevention strategies to mitigate future CVD risk.
PE history signals need for closer post-pregnancy BP surveillance in women; leaves open optimal prevention strategies.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women worldwide. Preeclampsia (PE) is an important and acknowledged female-specific risk factor. Women with a history of PE have an elevated risk to develop hypertension in the decade following their index pregnancy. In this paper, we aim to provide recent insights in the future risk of preeclampsia and describe how prevention strategies can be optimized. The development of premature hypertension is caused by multiple factors such as genetics and a persistent enhanced inflammatory state after PE. Systemic inflammation accelerates endothelial dysfunction and promotes the process of atherosclerosis. In formerly preeclamptic women, signs of subclinical atherosclerosis are present at young age. Timely cardiovascular screening after PE is recommended; however, the how and when are yet to be determined. Given the large impact of a previous preeclamptic pregnancy on cardiovascular risk, the question arises whether we should not intensify secondary prevention in these high-risk women. Obstetric history can provide useful information about CVD risk in women after their reproductive life, especially if they had a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Early detection of hypertension could optimize prevention and treatment strategies and mitigate CVD risk. For high-risk women, preeclampsia may be considered a first cardiovascular event that requires secondary prevention according to guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muijsers et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: