Why the study?
The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel combined with rivaroxaban compared to aspirin combined with rivaroxaban in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.
Does clopidogrel combined with rivaroxaban reduce the composite of MACE and MALE in patients with symptomatic PAD after revascularization compared to aspirin combined with rivaroxaban?
Does clopidogrel combined with rivaroxaban reduce the composite of MACE and MALE in patients with symptomatic PAD after revascularization compared to aspirin combined with rivaroxaban?
In patients with symptomatic PAD after revascularization, dual antithrombotic therapy with clopidogrel and rivaroxaban significantly reduced adverse cardiovascular and limb events compared to aspirin and rivaroxaban, without increasing bleeding risk.
Hypothesis-generating for clopidogrel-rivaroxaban in symptomatic PAD; prospective RCTs needed before clinical adoption.
Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination compared to aspirin-rivaroxaban combination in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods: Consecutive patients with symptomatic PAD patients were analyzed from January, 2018 to June, 2022 at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on the antithrombotic therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE), and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of any outcomes or the study end date (30 June 2024). Results: A total of 695 patients were enrolled into this study. The clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.41-0.83) without increasing the risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.27-1.69). When analyzed separately, clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination was associated with a reduced risk of MALE (HR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.41-0.91), although no significant differences were observed in terms of MACE (HR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.34-1.20) or all bleeding events (HR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.52-1.93). In the subgroup analysis, there were no significant interactions between the treatment groups and the subgroups of age, diabetes, lesion sites, Rutherford classifications and renal function for composite outcome, MACE and MALE. Conclusion: The clopidogrel-rivaroxaban combination in PAD patients may offer enhanced cardiovascular protection without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. These findings suggested that clopidogrel could be a superior alternative to aspirin in dual antithrombotic therapy for PAD management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lü et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: