Why the study?
Pre-existing chronic inflammatory conditions such as chronic coronary diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or obesity are linked to worse COVID-19 outcomes, motivating a review of the current knowledge linking systemic inflammation, these comorbidities, and COVID-19 mortality.
This review highlights that pre-existing chronic inflammatory conditions, including chronic coronary syndromes, diabetes, and obesity, significantly worsen clinical outcomes and increase mortality in COVID-19 patients.
May worsen COVID-19 evolution in patients with coronary disease or diabetes; leaves open whether targeting chronic inflammation improves outcomes.
COVID-19 is currently considered an inflammatory disease affecting the entire organism. In severe forms, an augmented inflammatory response leads to the fulminant "cytokine storm", which may result in severe multisystemic end-organ damage. Apart from the acute inflammatory response, it seems that chronic inflammation also plays a major role in the clinical evolution of COVID-19 patients. Pre-existing inflammatory conditions, such as those associated with chronic coronary diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus or obesity, may be associated with worse clinical outcomes in the context of COVID-19 disease. These comorbidities are reported as powerful predictors of poor outcomes and death following COVID-19 disease. Moreover, in the context of chronic coronary syndrome, the cytokine storm triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection may favor vulnerabilization and rupture of a silent atheromatous plaque, with consequent acute coronary syndrome, leading to a sudden deterioration of the clinical condition of the patient. This review aims to present the current status of knowledge regarding the link between COVID-19 mortality, systemic inflammation and several major diseases associated with poor outcomes, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buicu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: