Recent discussions of disciplinary writing have addressed the possibility that disciplinary genres cannot be taught. In particular, they have considered the proposition that if we understand disciplinary writing as a product of situated cognition, then it cannot be taught effectively by English faculty as part of a composition curriculum. David Russell, drawing on Vygotsky and Dewey, has argued this point forcefully: [Because writing is] a matter of learning to participate in some historically situated human activity that requires some kind(s) of writing, it cannot be leamed apart from the problems, the habits, the activities-the subject matter---of some group that found the need to write in that way to solve a problem or carry on its activities. (194) Russell recognizes that one logical consequence of this way of under-standing writing might be “to drop the abstraction (and perhaps the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linton et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: