Why the study?
Does hemodynamic unloading control VT storm in a patient with mid-septal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and apical ballooning?
Does hemodynamic unloading control VT storm in a patient with mid-septal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and apical ballooning?
Hemodynamic unloading may be an essential component of treatment for VT storm refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs or RFCA in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and apical ballooning.
May support hemodynamic unloading for refractory VT storm in mid-septal HCM with apical ballooning; hypothesis-generating from single case.
Medically refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm can be controlled with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), however, it may be difficult to control in some patients with hemodynamic overload. We experienced a patient with intractable VT storm controlled by hemodynamic unloading. The patient had mid-septal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) back-up. Because of the severe mid-septal hypertrophy, his left ventricle (LV) had an hourglass-like morphology and showed apical ballooning; the focus of VT was at the border of apical ballooning. Although we performed VT ablation because of electrical storm with multiple ICD shocks, VT recurred 1 hour after procedure. As the post-RFCA monomorphic VT was refractory to anti-tachycardia pacing or ICD shock, we reduced the hemodynamic overload of LV with β-blockade, hydration, and sedation. VT spontaneously stopped 1.5 hours later and the patient has remained free of VT for 24 months with β-blockade alone. In patients with VT storm refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs or RFCA, the mechanism of mechano-electrical feedback should be considered and hemodynamic unloading may be an essential component of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: