Key result
Primary PTAS is linked to a ~9-fold increase in major complications versus elective PTAS.
Why the study?
Does primary versus elective percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting affect safety and effectiveness in adults with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis?
Cohort (n=141)
Yes
Does primary versus elective percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting affect safety and effectiveness in adults with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elective PTAS for medically refractory symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is associated with very low major complication rates, whereas primary PTAS during acute ischemic stroke carries significantly higher thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks.
INTRODUCTION: To describe the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with pEGASUS-HPC stenting (PTAS) for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) and compare primary versus elective use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive adults with sICAS ≥50% treated with pEGASUS-HPC PTAS at 18 neurovascular centres (May 2021-February 2025). Primary PTAS was defined as treatment during non-large-vessel-occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS); Elective PTAS was performed at least 7 days after the qualifying ischaemic presentation for recurrent symptoms or haemodynamic compromise despite intensive medical therapy. Outcomes included technical success (post-treatment stenosis ≤50% without intraprocedural complications), in-hospital major complications (intracerebral haemorrhage, AIS or death), restenosis and functional status, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at last follow-up. RESULTS: Among 141 patients (Primary 71; Elective 70), median post-treatment stenosis was 23.0%; technical success was 94.3% (90.1% vs 98.6%; P = .063). In-hospital major complications occurred in 7.1% (12.7% Primary vs 1.4% Elective; P = .017), driven by intraprocedural in-stent thrombosis (9.9% vs 0%; P = .013). At last follow-up (median 9 months), restenosis ≥50% was observed in 14.3% (7.8% vs 19.7%; P = .10) and mRS <3 in 84.7% (82.1% vs 87.1%; P = .61). New diffusion-weighted imaging lesions were seen in 39.2% of 79 patients with early MRI, without group differences. DISCUSSION: In this multicentre cohort, pEGASUS-HPC PTAS provided substantial luminal gain, moderate restenosis and good mid-term functional outcomes overall. Elective use in medically refractory sICAS was associated with very low major complication rates, whereas primary use during AIS carried significantly higher thrombotic and haemorrhagic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanafer et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (n=141). Primary PTAS vs. Elective PTAS was evaluated on In-hospital major complications (intracerebral haemorrhage, AIS or death) (p=.017). Primary PTAS for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis was associated with higher in-hospital major complications compared to elective PTAS (12.7% vs 1.4%; P=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: