Why the study?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately diagnose and locate atrial-level shunts compared to traditional techniques?
Population
64 subjects, comprising 31 patients with proved atrial septal defect (ASD) and 33 control subjects.
Comparison
Gated transverse cardiac magnetic resonance… vs Proved diagnosis / traditional techniques
Design
Case-control, Retrospective review by a panel of cardiac radiologists by…
Authors
Loading...
CMR demonstrates high accuracy for ASD detection; leaves open its role versus echocardiography pending prospective validation.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately diagnose and locate atrial-level shunts compared to traditional techniques?
Cardiac MR imaging demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis and localization of atrial-level shunts and anomalous pulmonary venous connections.
Diethelm et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: