Why the study?
CAD and associated comorbidities such as HF remain leading causes of global morbidity and mortality, partially due to a lack of biomarkers for efficient disease diagnosis.
Does circulating PGLYRP1 serve as a diagnostic biomarker for coronary artery disease and heart failure?
Does circulating PGLYRP1 serve as a diagnostic biomarker for coronary artery disease and heart failure?
Circulating PGLYRP1 is a potential diagnostic biomarker for CAD and HF, and may have a causal role in cardiovascular impairment based on preclinical models.
PGLYRP1 may support CAD/HF diagnosis; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and associated comorbidities such as heart failure (HF) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide attributed to, at least partially, the lack of biomarkers for efficient disease diagnosis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic potential of serum peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 (PGLYRP1), an important component of the innate immunity and inflammation system, for both CAD and HF. A machine-learning method (random forest) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of circulating PGLYRP1 for diagnosis of CAD and HF in a total of 370 individuals. Causal links of chronic serum PGLYRP1 elevation to both diseases were further explored in ApoE-/- mice. The serum levels of PGLYRP1 were significantly higher in individuals with either chronic CAD or acute coronary syndrome than those in those without coronary artery stenosis (the control group) and even more pronounced in CAD individuals with concomitant HF. Our random forest classifier revealed that this protein performed better than other recommended clinical indicators in distinguishing the CAD from the control individuals. In addition, this protein associates more with the biomarkers of HF including left ventricular ejection fraction than inflammation. Notably, our mice experiment indicated that long-term treatment with recombinant PGLYRP1 could significantly impair the cardiovascular system as reflected from both increased atherogenic lesions and reduced fractional shortening of the left ventricle. Our findings, therefore, supported the circulating levels of PGLYRP1 as a valuable biomarker for both CAD and HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: