Why the study?
The authors aimed to present single-institute experience with inverted Y-patch repair for supravalvular aortic stenosis.
Does inverted Y-patch repair provide satisfactory outcomes and acceptable reoperation risk in patients with supravalvular aortic stenosis?
Does inverted Y-patch repair provide satisfactory outcomes and acceptable reoperation risk in patients with supravalvular aortic stenosis?
Inverted Y-patch (Doty) repair for supravalvular aortic stenosis provides satisfactory results with acceptable reoperation risk and good overall survival.
May support Doty repair feasibility in supravalvular aortic stenosis; leaves open need for larger studies on durability and outcomes.
Objective: This study presents our single-institute experience regarding the patients who underwent surgical correction via inverted Y-patch repair with the diagnosis of supravalvular aortic stenosis. Method: A total of 16 patients who underwent inverted Y-patch (Doty) repair in our center between 2005 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Complications, supravalvular residual gradient measurements, causes of re-operation were evaluated. Results: Patient population consisted of 9 males, 7 females with an overall mean age of 41.1816.14 months (range: 4 months to 19 years). Eight (50%) patients were diagnosed with Williams-Beuren syndrome and 3 (18.7%) with bicuspid aortic valve. Three (18.7%) patients had undergone simultaneous subaortic membrane resection and pulmonary patch plasty was performed in 2 (12.5%) patients. There was one (6.7%) inhospital death and no mortality was observed during follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 5.253.37 years. During this period, 2 (12.5%) patients required pulmonary balloon dilatation and one patient repeated Doty repair and aortic valve commissurotomy two years after the initial surgery. Thereafter the same patient needed aortic homograft valve replacement and Doty repair for the third time due to severe aortic insufficiency and suprvalvular aortic stenosis. Conclusion: Inverted Y-patch repair provides satisfactory results, acceptable reoperation risk, and good overall survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akkaya et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: